through now, the verdict is in: the $329 Ryzen 7 3700X is a brilliant CPU that competes well in opposition t the $385 Intel Core i7 9700K in gaming and blows it out of the water in multi-threaded content creation projects like video rendering or streaming. it's helped the 3700X develop into the most customary processor at one German retailer and result in AMD outselling Intel in studies from Korea and Japan. but how does the Ryzen 9 3900X fare? we have confirmed it against Intel's properly dog, the Core i9 9900K, to look which business claims the common laptop gaming crown.
firstly, let's discuss what we're coping with. The Ryzen 9 3900X is a completely-enabled Zen 2 design, meaning it contains 12 cores and 24 threads unfold throughout its two chiplets. that is 4 greater cores and eight more threads than the Ryzen 7 3700X, so we expect to look greatly enhanced efficiency in initiatives like video rendering which might be easy to smash up and perform in parallel. The flagship chip additionally aspects a just a little larger single-core enhance frequency than its mid-tier counterpart, which may still translate into more advantageous single-threaded efficiency too.
compared to previous Zen and Zen+ designs, this is an entire diverse beast. I/O is shifted to its personal die the use of a mature 12nm system, while every of the CPU chiplets uses a novel 7nm procedure that enables for more advantageous performance than previous generations while the use of much less power (and therefore producing less heat). This architectural shift is accompanied by means of a series of small however still gigantic alterations: the dimension of the L3 cache has doubled to ameliorate latency issues, a more efficient department predictor is used and AVX instructions are ultimately handled effectively.
The Ryzen 9 3900X tested in depth as Alex Battalgia seeks a pretty good 60fps.
Ryzen 9 3900X Ryzen 7 3700X Ryzen 7 2700X Core i9 9900K Core i7 9700K Cores/Threads 12/24 eight/sixteen eight/sixteen eight/16 eight/8 Single-Core rapid 4.6GHz 4.4GHz 4.3GHz 5.0GHz four.9GHz Max All-Core rapid 4.1GHz four.3GHz 4.1GHz four.7GHz 4.6GHz Cache 70MB 36MB 20MB 18MB 14MB TDP 105W 65W 105W 95W 95WThis all sounds remarkable, however's now not clear simply by searching on the spec sheet or analyzing the feature checklist how these processors will in reality perform in video games, particularly older titles that weren't engineered to make use of so many cores and threads. The simplest method to settle here is to run through a gauntlet of fresh and never-so-recent games at different resolutions - so that is exactly what now we have carried out.
earlier than we dive into the results, it's worth briefly bearing on how we performed these tests. We install a new windows 10 setting up - including the newest security and AMD scheduler patches - on fast SSD storage, with a Gigabyte 2TB PCIe 4.0 drive supplied by using AMD for our Ryzen third-gen testing and SATA SSDs used on different systems.
The fundamental benchmarking turned into done on the entry-stage £190 MSI MPG X570 Gaming Plus, with supplementary trying out on a high-conclusion motherboard, the £450 status X570 advent, with each boards provided by MSI. while the Gaming Plus is the least expensive MSI option for the X570 platform, the advent board may make feel for anyone considering heavy overclocking or the usage of assorted PCIe four.0 contraptions. that is because in addition to robust energy birth and help for severe memory overclocking past 4600MHz, the introduction board additionally comprises active chipset cooling and a full complement of PCI-e 4.0 lanes. there is even a PCI-e 4.0 add-on card that allows for two extra M.2 drives to be connected. meanwhile, 2nd-gen Ryzen changed into tested on an ASUS ROG Crosshair eight and the Core i9 9900K became confirmed on an ASUS ROG Maximus XI severe.
Cooling obligations had been break up, with the Ryzen chips the use of the extraordinary AMD Wraith Prism air cooler that comes bundled with all Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 9 processors and the Core i9 9900K paired with a Gaming Storm citadel 240mm AiO. In each and every case, we used GSkill Trident Z Royal 3600MHz CL16 RAM supplied by using AMD, a hefty 850W PSU and an open-air check bench.
whereas gaming efficiency will be the center of attention right here, we might be remiss to not mention performance in content advent projects like video rendering and transcoding. Our very personal Alex Battalgia has waxed lyrical in regards to the relative strength of the 3900X compared to his previous 1700X-powered workstation when it involves cranking out videos, but is there a great hole between 2nd and third-gen Ryzen as smartly? and how do Intel's chips stack up?
as soon as region we can go to get some solutions is Cinebench, a practical - if restrained - benchmark that mimics a rendering project in expert video application Cinema 4D. The old R15 edition of the check could be accomplished by way of contemporary CPUs before they reached their typical temperature limits, so the brand new R20 revision comprises a more challenging workload which is greater reflective of sustained efficiency. both single-threaded and multi-threaded exams are offered, which allow us to get a way of how Ryzen has advanced gen-on-gen in opposition t the backdrop of Intel's providing.
The Core i9 9900K remains the one-core king right here, however the Ryzen 9 3900X is simply just a few points at the back of thanks largely to the 21 per cent generational advantage we noticed for the 3700X over the 2700X. This shut influence means that the 3900X may still stay aggressive even in older video games that have not been architected for up to date programs, whatever thing you couldn't say of first or 2nd-gen Ryzen, however we are going to must see how these titles play out. The multi-threaded results see the 3900X come out on appropriate via 38 per cent, thanks to the better number of cores and threads AMD's flagship chip is packing.
Video encoding in usual open source tool Handbrake is a good greater practical illustration, and that is the reason where we are going to flip to now. For this test, we encoded the same sample video file using the x264 (h.264) and x265 (HEVC) compression standards on the creation nice common preset at CRF 18. The Ryzen 9 3900X shows the identical generic trends as the Ryzen 7 3700X, with a small raise in h.264 encoding speeds and a major uplift in HEVC encoding because of that better AVX instruction managing we mentioned earlier. The more advantageous core count places even the Core i9 9900K to disgrace, with AMD's latest #1 buyer CPU main the 9900K via 37 per cent for h.264 and 25 per cent for HEVC - a good effect.
or not it's much more staggering if you happen to seem at the power consumption figures, as measured from the wall throughout the HEVC encode verify. AMD's 7nm chiplets propel the Ryzen 9 3900X to 9900K-beating ranges of efficiency while consuming a lot much less power; we measured a optimum of 228W in comparison to 266W for the Intel system, a difference of around 15 per cent.
Ryzen 9 3900X Ryzen 7 3700X Ryzen 7 2700X Core i9 9900K Core i7 9700K Cinebench R20 1T 514 494 408 520 498 Cinebench R20 MT 7032 4730 3865 5090 3922 Handbrake h.264 51.80fps 35.05fps 27.31fps 37.87fps 28.77fps Handbrake HEVC 20.29fps 14.67fps 10.04fps sixteen.22fps 13.12fps HEVC power intake228W 152W 224W 266W 171WThese are solid effects to say the least, however let's now not get carried away. Our ardour is trying out in-game efficiency, and that may also be a completely different kettle of fish from synthetic benchmarks and content material advent workloads. AMD has always been competitive when it involves getting work executed, but can they beat Intel at domestic with superior gaming outcomes too and in fact push the boat out?
To answer this question a technique or yet another, we essential to discover massive - and repeatable - online game scenes that could show the adjustments between distinctive gaming CPUs. here is more durable than it sounds, as CPU-constrained eventualities are a good deal extra at risk of random interference from working system procedures and straightforward run-to-run variance than GPU-bound cases. Even with all issues equal, diverse sections of the same one-minute look at various scene can reveal Intel ahead of AMD and vice versa. it is why we recommend checking out the video assessment embedded above or at least gazing the actual-time metrics as each and every verify scene plays out, as you'll get a extra significant realizing of these chips' relative performance than you are going to from looking on the ordinary or worst one per cent frametime metrics in isolation. After combating during the bugbears and pushing lower back the release of this overview, we're ultimately able t o share our findings.
We confirmed each and every game at 1080p, 1440p and 2160p, the use of the most effective buyer GPU available on the market: the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. The 1080p benchmarks mirror a excessive-end equipment aiming for extremely excessive body-fees to make full use of high refresh price screens, however this does mean dealing with the stutter that frequently accompanies CPU-bound scenarios. The 1440p results might be critical for anybody at the present resolution "candy spot", the place a mid-range to excessive-conclusion device can obtain body-prices in excess of 60fps and often nearer to 120fps with out sacrificing visible constancy. ultimately, our 4K results symbolize what's arguably essentially the most balanced state of affairs, where there is a decent amount of CPU overhead and you're more likely to be GPU-bound backyard of a number of esports titles.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X analysis
No comments:
Post a Comment